Mar 162017

By Claire Byun

As of right now, the Tulane Canal neighborhood doesn’t have it’s own special security patrols and is not included in the Mid-City Security District. But it could be something Tulane Canal Neighborhood Association members consider for the future.

Patrick Armstrong, with the Mid-City Neighborhood Association, wanted to float the idea of including Tulane Canal into MCSD before proposing new legislation. The special district is based on state legislation and has to go up to ballot every few years, which gives organizers the ability to modify the district’s boundaries and payment options.

Expanding MCSD’s boundaries is just an idea at this point – there are no concrete plans, but Armstrong wanted to get some feedback from other neighborhood groups before planning any changes.

The special district goes up to ballot again in a few years, and Armstrong is planning to personally propose legislation changes concerning how MCSD is paid for and the scope and neighborhoods it covers.

As for now, including Tulane Canal into MCSD’s boundaries is just theoretical. But Armstrong – who presented the idea at TCNA’s meeting Wednesday – said he wants to get a jump on the new legislation so TCNA isn’t left out in the future.

“That chance is coming open, and I don’t want to be behind the curve on this,” Armstrong said.

The district is funded through residential and commercial property fees. Since property owners pay for protection based on the number of parcels they occupy, some homeowners are paying nearly the same as a large scale apartment building. The funding system is almost identical to the Lakeview Crime Prevention District but doesn’t make sense for a mixed-use neighborhood like Mid-City, Armstrong said.

Homeowners pay $220 per parcel and businesses are charged $330. Last year, the MCSD board voted to raise its rates by 10 percent to combat the rising costs of police salaries and vehicle maintenance.

While expanding MCSD boundaries is just an idea, Jacob Rickoll, TCNA president, said the neighborhood should consider alternative ways of safety and protection. Rickoll volunteers with the New Orleans Police Department’s Mobile Crisis Unit, which helps intervene and treat those who will benefit from mental health care. In that role, he understands how thinly NOPD officers are stretched and said it might be beneficial to have set patrols that are not called away for any reason.

“We’re all just testing the waters to see how we feel about this,” Rickoll said.

Antonia Carbone, TCNA member, asked if expanding the district is meant to bring in more resources or provide more patrols for everyone. The idea, Armstrong said, would be to raise money for more patrols while lowering the tax impact on everyone included.

But to get the new legislation to pass ballot again, it needs to be made more affordable. Including more neighborhoods into the district would help solve that problem, Armstrong said.

“We can start thinking about what’s realistically affordable, because we have time, and we can start brainstorming and talking to neighbors,” Rickoll said.

  2 Responses to “To help reduce fees for residents, should MCSD expand boundaries?”

  1. Mid City doesnt HAVE …its own special security patrols… as originally voted on… WHY would anyone vote to expand a back door way to fund NOPD? Had the original structured guidelines stayed in place…we could call for Quality of Life issues and NON emergency issues…supposedly taking the burden OFF the regular patrols… NOW we just fund a couple extra cars and boots on the ground with no priority for our payments. Why would Tulane Corridor want to burden themselves with MORE payments. When and IF we could EVER actually SEE the “pay sheets” submitted…not just a lump sum of how much the city bills and MCSD pays ppl might be suprised at what we are actually paying for… and these amounts should be added into the NOPD Budget for ALL the Security Districts that have morphed into this same arrangement. Dont understand why Mr Armstrong would want to expand a program that is in reality not want was voted on…. Maybe he wasnt here when they first presented it….but when the next vote comes around …it should be looked at with a microscope. IF NOPD we able to hire enough officers to join the force these back door funding schemes would not be needed… Guess we will have to wait for the next Mayor and his anointee to Chief and see if ppl will want to work for their administration…as it sits now…they hire on…train and leave for JP or State or other LEO agencies…. WHY expand a non existence security patrol?

  2. Please explain how it would LOWER FEES…it would require MORE patrols and more money…not less…??

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>