Feb 192013
 

A memorial stands in late May of 2012 in front of a home in the 4000 block of Baudin Street, where 58-year-old Rafael Quintanillla was killed May 29. (File photo via wwltv.com)

Two young teenage boys — one 13 years old and the other 15 — now face juvenile life sentences that will keep them in jail until age 21 for their alleged involvement in a robbery gone wrong last May that left a Mid-City man dead.

The two boys approached 58-year-old Rafael Quintanilla as he sat on his porch in the 4000 block of Baudin Street on the afternoon of May 29, 2012, police said at the time. The 13-year-old pointed a .380 caliber pistol at Quintanilla and demanded that the man give him “everything,” police said.

Before he could comply, the 13-year-old shot him in the stomach and they both ran off, police said.

The 15-year-old boy had a Mohawk hairstyle the day of the shooting, easy for police to spot as they apprehended him minutes after the crime, authorities have said. After he was in custody, he told police the 13-year-old was the gunman and that he had an ankle bracelet from prior run-in with the law. Police tracked the 13-year-old to eastern New Orleans shortly thereafter and he was taken into custody, authorities said.

Almost a year later, the two boys are facing almost certain lock-up until age 21.

Assistant District Attorney Chris Bowman said the 15-year-old boy pled guilty in December and will serve a juvenile life term. The 13-year-old boy is expected to plead guilty in a court appearance March 13 and also receive a juvenile life sentence.

First-degree murder, second-degree murder, aggravated rape and aggravated kidnapping all carry a mandatory life sentence for juveniles, requiring them to remain in custody without probation or parole until they turn 21, according to the state Children’s Code.

Dana Kaplan, executive director of the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana, said rehabilitation is crucial for young offenders.

“Studies show that the juvenile justice system is the most appropriate place to have juveniles,” said Kaplan, rather than sending them to adult courts.

Kaplan said state facilities offer schooling, rehabilitative programs and vocational training.

“It’s not just about the sentence,” said Kaplan, stressing that rehabilitative programming and re-entry plans are a key part of the process.

The law also requires the department to prepare an “individualized and thorough transitional plan that identifies the techniques, programs, personnel, and facilities that will be used to assist the child in achieving a successful return to his family and the community.”

The Office of Juvenile Justice has funded community-based reentry providers to help with a healthy transition back into society, Kaplan said, but these programs have been affected by state budget cuts.

  4 Responses to “Two teen boys face juvenille life sentences in killing of Mid-City man”

  1. I think they should get life if found guilty. It does not make sense to set them free at 21. They will just be back on the streets. http://articles.latimes.com/1995-05-11/news/mn-65086_1_adult-court

  2. Just a thought:

    If these “juveniles” aren’t all that responsible for their behavior and for the murder of this 58-year old man sitting on a porch, should not the PARENTS be held accountable for their children’s actions?

    Hence, if the juveniles are NOT 100% responsible in the murder and not considered as ADULTS, then the PARENTS should be. As they, the parents, can be thought of as accomplices, accessories to murder, or harboring a criminal, etc. and should be held accountable their child’s actions.

    Someone has to be treated as the ADULT in a murder. If not the child, then the PARENTS should be considered partly responsible. It’s the PARENTS that are the ADULTS and should held accountable for the child’s actions.

    Would like to have someone, e.g. lawyer, lawmaker, or anyone, including te ACLU, comment on this thought.

    One can imaging there are some exceptions, like incest, under 21, etc., but if the PARENTS have kids and are over 18, generally, the PARENTS should be held also accountable.

    To what degree? that is a matter of debate and discussion.

    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - –
    Follow me on Twitter @AhContraire

  3. Dana Kaplan defending the sentence…awesome. Typical NY extreme liberal thinking. Wonder if she would feel guilty if the victim were here brother, dad, or husband. Good thing we booted her from the city council.

  4. [...] block was a murder scene less than a year ago when 58-year-old Rafael Quintanilla was gunned down outside his home on the corner of Baudin and Canal by two teenage boys. Onlookers stood outside the pink home of the late Quintanilla as they tried to [...]

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>